In conclusion the attitudes towards women in the plays Hamlet Essay Example For Students

In conclusion the attitudes towards women in the plays Hamlet Essay When this is delivered we have to remember that women could not perform on stage in Shakespearian England. Therefore Rosalind would have been played by a male character, showing again the limitations of women. In conclusion the attitudes towards women in the plays Hamlet, Troilus and Cressida and As You Like It are that women are weak. This weakness is shown in different ways. In Hamlet and in Troilus and Cressida it is shown by women giving in to temptation and not being strong enough to withhold from it. However in As You Like It the form of weakness is shown by the need of a male presence. Due to the position of women in Shakespearian society all these plays show women as the inferior sex. They are seen as unimportant and not serious. Although As You Like It shows a gradual progression of female characters all the plays studied reflect the dominant gender values at the time. Therefore in conclusion the attitudes towards women in the plays studies are in fact mainly negative attitudes in all three of the plays. In conclusion Shakespeares play Hamlet portrays women as secondary characters which are weak and dependant on the male characters. The women dont form their own views and opinions. They are shown as obedient to the male characters. The portrayal of women in this way shows that the attitude towards them in the play Hamlet is not one of equality. Women are seen as the inferior sex. The main female character in Troilus and Cressida is the character of Cressida. She is the love interest of Troilus. There are similarities to Hamlet in the attitudes towards women. ]BIBLIOGRAPHY As You Like It, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, William Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, William Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Juliet Dusinberre, Macmillan Press Ltd 1975 The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare, An Introduction with Documents, Russ Mcdonald, Macmillan Press Ltd The Oxford Shakespeare, Comedies, William Shakespeare, (Troilus And Cressida), Oxford University Press Ltd 1987 Shakespeares Tragedies, G. B. Harrison, Routledge Kegan Paul Ltd 1951 Shakespeare and Society, Critical Studies in Shakespearian Drama, Terence Eagleton, Chatto Windus Ltd. 1967 New Casebooks, Hamlet, Contemporary Critical Essays, Edited by Martin Coyle. Macmillan Education Ltd 1992 http://www. sparknotes. com/shakespeare/hamlet/canalysis. html Mabillard, Amanda, Shakespeares Ophelia 2000, http://www. shakespeare-online. com/opheliachor. html 1 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,3,117) 2 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,3,117) 3 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,3,30) 4 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 94 5 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 94 6 Mabillard, Amanda, Shakespeares Ophelia 2000, (28/04/06) http://www. shakespeare-online. com/opheliachor. html 7 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 94 8 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 93. 9 Elaine Showalter, Representing Ophelia. New Casebooks, Hamlet, Contemporary Critical Essays, Edited by Martin Coyle. Macmillan Education Ltd 1992. Pg 115 10 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (4,7,173) 11 Elaine Showalter, Representing Ophelia. New Casebooks, Hamlet, Contemporary Critical Essays, Edited by Martin Coyle. Macmillan Education Ltd 1992. Pg 118 12David Leverenz, The Woman in Hamlet; An Interpersonal View. New Casebooks, Hamlet, Contemporary Critical Essays, Edited by Martin Coyle. .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 , .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .postImageUrl , .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 , .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3:hover , .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3:visited , .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3:active { border:0!important; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3:active , .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3 .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf8e57f49fa3df6bf4289ac02fb7d7ac3:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Hamlet: The Theme of Having A Clear Conscience EssayMacmillan Education Ltd 1992. Pg 144 13 Mabillard, Amanda, Shakespeares Ophelia 2000, (28/04/06) http://www. shakespeare-online. com/opheliachor. html 14 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,2,157) 15 Mabillard, Amanda, Shakespeares Ophelia 2000, (28/04/06) http://www. shakespeare-online. com/opheliachor. html 16 Mabillard, Amanda, Shakespeares Ophelia 2000, (28/04/06) http://www. shakespeare-online. com/opheliachor. html 17 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 75. 18 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (3,1,103) 19 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,2,157) 20 http://www. sparknotes. com/shakespeare/hamlet/canalysis. html, (26/04/06) 21 William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (4,3,56). 22 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 100 23 The Oxford Shakespeare, Comedies, William Shakespeare, Troilus And Cressida (3,2,191) 24 Shakespeares Tragedies, G. B. Harrison, Routledge Kegan Paul Ltd 1951, pg127 25 The Oxford Shakespeare, Comedies, William Shakespeare, Troilus And Cressida (4,6,55) 26 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 148 27 The Oxford Shakespeare, Comedies, William Shakespeare, Troilus And Cressida (5,2,131) 28 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 193. 29 The Oxford Shakespeare, Comedies, William Shakespeare, Troilus And Cressida (5,2,112) 30 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 193 31 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 193 32 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 65 33 The Oxford Shakespeare, Comedies, William Shakespeare, Troilus And Cressida (5,2,111) 34 Russ Mcdonald, The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare, An Introduction with Documents, Macmillan Press Ltd, pg252. 35 William Shakespeare, As You Like It, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,3,97) 36 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 113 37 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 113 38 William Shakespeare, As You Like It, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,3,70) 39 William Shakespeare, As You Like It, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (1,3,77). 40 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 114 41 Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare and The Nature of Women, Macmillan Press Ltd 198, pg 114 42 William Shakespeare, As You Like It, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (3,3,340) 43 William Shakespeare, As You Like It, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, (3,3,302) 44 William Shakespeare, As You Like It, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, Edited by Phillip Edwards, Cambridge University Press 1985, 2003, epilogue line 1.